Primary 2008
#1
Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:21 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/03/iow...uses/index.html
Any reaction??
BTHSnews Club Mod
BTHS Math Team
#2
Posted 03 January 2008 - 09:30 PM
#3
Posted 03 January 2008 - 10:26 PM
#4
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:54 PM
#5
Posted 03 January 2008 - 11:57 PM
#6
Posted 04 January 2008 - 12:12 AM
Charles, on Jan 3 2008, 11:54 PM, said:
Actually after looking at how much he lost by I take it back. He only received 2% of the votes. I was surprised that Giuliana finished so low.
#7
#8
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:31 AM
As for Mike Huckabee, I don't agree with him on many things, but I really hate Mitt Romney. I'm just hoping that this spells the end for Romney, and hopefully Giuliani too. I also want to finally have the Ron Paul supporters shut up, but that probably won't happen until much later, seeing as his supporters have given him millions to finish in 5th place in Iowa.
BTHS Class of 2006, Technology & Liberal Arts
Tulane Class of 2010, Political Science
#9
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:45 AM


tycoonboy388, on Jan 4 2008, 10:31 AM, said:
#10
Posted 04 January 2008 - 01:14 PM
#11
Posted 04 January 2008 - 08:30 PM
BTHSnews Club Mod
BTHS Math Team
#12
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:04 PM
I think this is a good site to see where each candidate stands on the issues.
#13
Posted 04 January 2008 - 11:07 PM
AFaust3, on Jan 4 2008, 10:45 AM, said:
He looks a little bit like Logan, but Logan really looked like Nixon to me, and Huckabee doesn't remind me of Nixon at all. Maybe because I still remember Huckabee before he became a frontrunner when people joked that his claim to fame was losing 100 pounds.
AFaust3, on Jan 4 2008, 10:45 AM, said:
Yeah, I know how the Democratic Caucus works, but still, if you look at the results from 2004, more candidates finished with actual results. Kerry and Edwards both polled over 30%, but Richard Gephardt and Howard Dean still polled big numbers (18% and 10%). By contrast, Richardson was basically shut out, with not even 2% of the delegates, I don't think anyone expected that, because I don't think anyone thought Obama, Clinton and Edwards would all poll over 30%.
z2z007, on Jan 4 2008, 01:14 PM, said:
Z, I don't exactly what you mean here. More people participated in the Democratic Caucus, nearly twice as many people voted in the Democratic caucus over the Republican caucus. I think the final tally is 239,000 to 120,000. The Democrats had a big showing last night. Can you elaborate?
BTHS Class of 2006, Technology & Liberal Arts
Tulane Class of 2010, Political Science
#14
Posted 04 January 2008 - 11:35 PM
#15
Posted 04 January 2008 - 11:36 PM
i'm pretty happy Obama won by such a nice percentage, what was is it like 7% or 8% percent more? i'm also happy for Edwards' second place finish... i think hes a good guy even though i wouldn't support him in the primaries...
on the Republican side... haha, who saw Chuck Norris behind Huckabee when he was delivering that speech? sooo funny! i'm pretty happy Romney didn't win and that Guliani didn't do well (though he wasn't really trying to win Iowa)... i was hoping McCain would beat out thompson... but obviously that didn't happen. hopefully McCain will gain some ground in New Hampshire.
also i thought it was funny that Duncan Hunter received votes when he dropped out over a week ago...
and you want Lou Dobbs to run as an independent? he'd have no chance at all... I do hope Bloomberg runs though with Chuck Hagel as VP... that'd be sweet
#16
Posted 05 January 2008 - 03:28 PM
Visit us online at:
bthssurvey.weebly.com
#17
Posted 05 January 2008 - 05:41 PM
katinka, on Jan 5 2008, 03:28 PM, said:
I don't think hes worried about his Iowa finish... i don't think anyone was expecting him to get a top spot in a fairly religious state (Iowa) with a Baptist Minister running... New Hampshire on the other hand is a state that will be more telling for him
#18
Posted 05 January 2008 - 07:24 PM
#19
Posted 05 January 2008 - 07:33 PM
Republican side, Hucakbee is better than the rest but Ron Paul truly stands out. It's a shame he won't win. He's the only logically thinking candidate on their side.
#20
Posted 05 January 2008 - 08:02 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














