Jump to content


hmm..which phone...


  • You cannot reply to this topic
40 replies to this topic

#41 azntechguy

    BTHS Alumnus

  • Forum Extraordinaires
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 930 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Major:Bio-Med
  • Class of: 2006
  • Status: Alum
  • College:Hunter College

Posted 16 February 2008 - 09:52 AM

View PostZoSo, on Feb 14 2008, 11:07 PM, said:

That is absolutely not true. CDMA has stopped with EV-DO, examining GSM's continuous wave of improving data transmission protocols -- most of which take forever to make it to this side of the pond -- GSM is clearly the more heavily invested, developed, evolving, and more practical choice, if not for its potential and versatility alone. CDMA is stagnant. That is why I said that GSM is "leaps and bounds" ahead of GSM in terms of data networks.


Actually, I have to retract a statement of mine.

After consulting with Wikipedia and asking for concensus with a mobile phone community, HSDPA and other more recent data protocols aren't even a subset family of GSM although the industry tends to market it as a direct branch of GSM!

For example HSDPA is technically classified as a subset of UMTS, which is different and distinct from GSM and was designed to succeed GSM. In a twist of irony, many networks offer UMTS using the W-CDMA standard.

But long story short, further developments on GSM is futile. It's like trying to continuously improve the Ford Model A... it's time to move on to a different platform! CDMA has some more life left to it, but it's not that too far off from GSM. Both are becoming outdated technologies.

Brooklyn Tech Class of 2006 ▶ Bio-Med Major

Hunter College 2011 ▶ Biochemistry (BA) | Adolescent Education (MA)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users