Stuy vs. Tech Lockers
#1
Posted 11 January 2009 - 09:46 PM
http://arseniic.deviantart.com/art/Combina...Locks-104839322
BTHS Student Government: Senior Class President 2010
International Arts and Sciences
University at Buffalo, the State University of New York '14
Medicinal Chemistry
#3
Posted 12 January 2009 - 05:25 PM
Executive Director of Divisions
Chief Editor
#4
Posted 12 January 2009 - 06:06 PM
BTHS Student Government: Senior Class President 2010
International Arts and Sciences
University at Buffalo, the State University of New York '14
Medicinal Chemistry
#5
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:00 PM
Tech Alum '10
Bio-Med Major
Emory University '14
International Business @ Goizueta Business School
#6
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:11 PM
Nice idea, but the implementation is DOA. The shackle clearly interrupts the range of motion for the cube (whether in an open or closed position), which defeats the concept of the Rubik's cube. Long story short, you just have a fancy looking, excessively bulky paperweight *shrug*
FAIL!
Brooklyn Tech Class of 2006 ▶ Bio-Med Major
Hunter College 2011 ▶ Biochemistry (BA) | Adolescent Education (MA)
#7
Posted 12 January 2009 - 07:25 PM
azntechguy, on Jan 12 2009, 07:11 PM, said:
Nice idea, but the implementation is DOA. The shackle clearly interrupts the range of motion for the cube (whether in an open or closed position), which defeats the concept of the Rubik's cube. Long story short, you just have a fancy looking, excessively bulky paperweight *shrug*
FAIL!
Lol it's just a joke where people assume kids that can solve Rubik's cubes are smart and Stuyvesant kids are "claimed" to be the smartest.
#8
Posted 12 January 2009 - 10:08 PM
azntechguy, on Jan 12 2009, 07:11 PM, said:
Nice idea, but the implementation is DOA. The shackle clearly interrupts the range of motion for the cube (whether in an open or closed position), which defeats the concept of the Rubik's cube. Long story short, you just have a fancy looking, excessively bulky paperweight *shrug*
FAIL!
I'm sure they can devise some workaround of the physical issues with the use of good old quantum tunneling.
#10
Posted 13 January 2009 - 12:57 AM
z2z007, on Jan 12 2009, 10:08 PM, said:
When they do, I'll be sure to use those principles to facilitate myself out of this world.
It's not like many people will miss my absence anyway
Brooklyn Tech Class of 2006 ▶ Bio-Med Major
Hunter College 2011 ▶ Biochemistry (BA) | Adolescent Education (MA)
#11
Posted 13 January 2009 - 05:29 PM
For our lockers, instead of having Rubrics cubes, we should have the Puzzle Cubes they make us do in freshmen year in DDP. The thing you do with 5 components, has to make up a 3x3x3 cube... >.<
OUR version of the Rubrics cube.
#12
Posted 13 January 2009 - 10:05 PM
#13
Posted 13 January 2009 - 10:18 PM
bare canvas, on Jan 13 2009, 10:05 PM, said:
That must suck because if all the lockers had the same lock and u didn't memorize your locker number, it would be hard to remember which locker is yours.
#14
Posted 13 January 2009 - 11:53 PM
Wilson, on Jan 13 2009, 10:18 PM, said:
Well that would make sense, wouldn't it?
#15
Posted 28 February 2009 - 01:34 PM

Post below is probably more informative
#16
Posted 01 March 2009 - 10:24 PM
Wilson, on Jan 13 2009, 10:18 PM, said:
Well actually, in my freshman year (2002-2003), students were allowed to use their own locks. From my recollection, many people used the standard combo Master locks anyway.
I was always a visual type of guy, so I memorized the relative location of my locker in the locker room. Failing that, I looked for my lockermates.
Brooklyn Tech Class of 2006 ▶ Bio-Med Major
Hunter College 2011 ▶ Biochemistry (BA) | Adolescent Education (MA)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















